Rare Clear Video Of two Suns – Dwarf Star and the Sun. Look for yourself and please feel free to let us in on your thoughts.

Subscribe: https://goo.gl/YsrT26
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-^_^-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
http://www.NibiruToday.com/

Wikipedia:
The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. The idea that a planet-sized object will collide with or closely pass by Earth in the near future is not supported by any scientific evidence and has been rejected by astronomers and planetary scientists as pseudoscience and an Internet hoax.[2][3]

The idea was first put forward in 1995 by Nancy Lieder,[4][5] founder of the website ZetaTalk. Lieder describes herself as a contactee with the ability to receive messages from extraterrestrials from the Zeta Reticuli star system through an implant in her brain. She states that she was chosen to warn mankind that the object would sweep through the inner Solar System in May 2003 (though that date was later postponed) causing Earth to undergo a physical pole shift that would destroy most of humanity.[6] The prediction has subsequently spread beyond Lieder’s website and has been embraced by numerous Internet doomsday groups, most of which linked the event to the 2012 phenomenon. Since 2012, the Nibiru cataclysm has frequently reappeared in the popular media; usually linked to newsmaking astronomical objects such as Comet ISON or Planet Nine. Although the name “Nibiru” is derived from the works of the ancient astronaut writer Zecharia Sitchin and his interpretations of Babylonian and Sumerian mythology, he denied any connection between his work and various claims of a coming apocalypse.

Contents
1 Origins

1.1 Zecharia Sitchin and Sumer

2 Scientific rejection
3 Conspiracy theories
4 Misappellations

4.1 Planet X
4.2 Hercolubus
4.3 Nemesis
4.4 Sedna or Eris
4.5 Tyche
4.6 Comet Elenin
4.7 Comet ISON
4.8 Planet Nine
4.9 2016 WF9
The idea of the Nibiru encounter originated with Nancy Lieder, a Wisconsin woman who claims that as a girl she was contacted by gray extraterrestrials called Zetas, who implanted a communications device in her brain. In 1995, she founded the website ZetaTalk to disseminate her ideas.[7] Lieder first came to public attention on Internet newsgroups during the build-up to Comet Hale–Bopp’s 1997 perihelion. She stated, claiming to speak as the Zetas,[8] that “The Hale–Bopp comet does not exist. It is a fraud, perpetrated by those who would have the teeming masses quiescent until it is too late. Hale–Bopp is nothing more than a distant star, and will draw no closer.”[9] She claimed that the Hale–Bopp story was manufactured to distract people from the imminent arrival of a large planetary object, “Planet X”, which would soon pass by Earth and destroy civilization.[9] After Hale–Bopp’s perihelion revealed it as one of the brightest and longest-observed comets of the last century,[10] Lieder removed the first two sentences of her initial statement from her site, though they can still be found in Google’s archives.[9] Her claims eventually made the New York Times.[11]

Extra Tags:

Nibiru “Planet x” “Nibiru Planet x” “Planet 7x” nemesis nephilim anunnaki “planeta x” “planeta nibiru” “los anunnaki” “nibiru update” “nibiru update 2016” elenin zeta “zeta talk” “two sun” “nibiru visible” “asia continent” “canada country” “europe continent” “european members states” “united states of america country” “united kingdom” “england country” “india country”

2 COMMENTS

  1. This video seems to be faked, because, there is only 1 lens flair. When the videographer opens up his aperture and the second, smaller orb on the left gets bright, there should be a second lens flair. The presence of only 1 lens flair indicates that there was only 1 light source. Modern video editing software makes it easy to add more layers to your video. I am thinking the video creator may have added the orb on the left on an overlay layer of the video, because, we should see a second lens flair. I could be wrong, but, just sayin…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here